The fresh LSD try showed that the top of one’s curvilinear relationship is at the new 302 pal position

The fresh LSD try showed that the top of one’s curvilinear relationship is at the new 302 pal position

The fresh LSD try showed that the top of one’s curvilinear relationship is at the new 302 pal position

Hypotheses Testing

Hypothesis 1 predicted a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship between the number of friends a profile owner has and observers’ perceptions of the profile owner’s (a) social and (b) physical attractiveness. In order to test these relationships, one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted with number of friends as the independent variable and social attractiveness and physical attractiveness as the dependent variables. Hypothesis 1a was supported. Results showed a significant quadratic effect for the relationship of number of friends on social attractiveness, F (1, 129) = 2.78, p = .098, ? 2 = .02. 2 2 A statistical significance rule of p < .10 for directional hypothesis tests was employed, given the a priori prediction of the inverted-U curvilinear function (see Levine & Banas, 2002 ). Descriptive statistics appear in Table 1. In order to confirm the direction of the curve, the means were subjected to a post-hoc least significant differences (LSD) test. That is, targets were viewed as most socially attractive when they had 302 friends.

  • Note: Means with different superscripts differ within columns at the p < .05 level.

The relationship ranging from level of family unit members and you will bodily elegance didn’t proceed with the predicted curvilinear dating. The entire F together with specific attempt to possess quadratic outcomes had been not very much, F (1, 129) = 2.47, p = .119. Theory 1b was not served. Post-hoc LSD analyses failed to tell you people pairwise differences among the many four setting (look for Dining table step 1).

Hypothesis 2 forecast a great linear matchmaking involving the amount of family a visibility owner has and observers’ thinking of one’s profile customer’s extraversion. A keen omnibus you to-ways ANOVA which have extraversion while the created adjustable try tall, F (cuatro, 129) = step 3.several, p= But not, the brand new linear effect specified by the H2 was not supported, F (step one, 129) = 2.32, p = .13. Rather, a life threatening quartic feeling emerged, F (step 1, 129) = 5.66, p= .02. Blog post hoc investigation having fun with LSD evaluations displayed tall pairwise variations certainly one of a few of the structure recommending (a) a good curvilinear ugly-You impact total, for the high level of extraversion taking place during the 502 household members height. Regardless if thought of extraversion trailed out-of outside of the top, the better quantities of loved ones (702 and you may 902) sparked not less extraversion as compared to top. However, a decreased quantities of friends (102 or 302) prompted significantly all the way down extraversion judgments compared to top from 502 (discover Dining table step 1 to possess over show). It appears that with much more family in reality connotes deeper extraversion to have Myspace profile residents, slightly due to the fact predicted, but that the connection is not an immediate linear pattern. Probably the most extroverted attributions was directed to people having an increased-than-mediocre quantity of nearest and dearest.


The intention of this study were to determine the sort from the partnership ranging from sociometric evidence regarding connectedness represented on Facebook and you will the brand new public appeal, bodily appeal, and you can extraversion of the reputation holder thought from the anyone else. This study posed questions about the nature ones dating and you will subsequently found aftereffects of what generated by the brand new social network system towards the others’ perception of an individual from inside the a social networking environment.

There is certainly a great curvilinear relationship within quantity of family one character citizens are purported to has and you may others’ thinking of the public elegance. Far more particularly, regarding updates where the reputation holder encountered the fewest members of the family (102), studies of person’s societal elegance had been among the lowest. Recommendations of your person’s social elegance had been large if profile shown the profile holder got just as much as three hundred family relations. Past you to definitely quantity of household members, recommendations out-of a visibility owner’s public attractiveness declined so you can a level approaching the fresh new 102 nearest and dearest status. Even though there was basically zero extreme differences between societal elegance in the really reasonable and incredibly ideal number of friends’ conditions, absolutely the values of the related form is actually popular on the direction you to suggests it is best having unnecessary family unit members rather than have too little.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.